WTF !?!

December 30, 2005

I would have immediately – without question – pulled by kid from that school and moved out of the Peoples Republic of Kalifornia. Terrorism? Nope, Liberals will be the end of this Country. There is a point where it’s not “ok” to be “open” about something. Limits are called limits for a reason. If the liberal kuck-koo birds go nutz over Christianity being even mentioned in passing, why aren’t they saying a word now? Read this if you want to know what got my dander up.

Advertisements

Hell

December 11, 2005

Bill Gates
Circle I Limbo

Uday Hussein
Circle II Whirling in a Dark & Stormy Wind

Parents who bring squalling brats to R-rated movies
Circle III Mud, Rain, Cold, Hail & Snow

General asshats
Circle IV Rolling Weights

Qusay Hussein
Circle V Stuck in Mud, Mangled

River Styx

Osama bin Laden
Circle VI Buried for Eternity

River Phlegyas

Saddam Hussein
Circle VII Burning Sands

Tax Protesters
Circle IIX Immersed in Excrement

Democrats
Circle IX Frozen in Ice

Design your own hell

A “poem” from Gene

December 5, 2005

Gene

Posted 12/03/2005 05:31:00 PM by Gene
Slave Trader

a poem by Gene Chapman

I remember the election of 2004
Kerry had a statue in downtown Hanoi.
I ain’t sayin’ he a slave trader
But he ain’t makin’ us no free, free.
I ain’t sayin’ he a slave trader
But he ain’t makin’ us no free, free.

I remember how Hillary headed Social Medicine
Don’t blame me now for bein’ a little hesitant.
I ain’t sayin’ she a slave trader
But she ain’t makin’ us no free, free.
I ain’t sayin’ she a slave trader
But she ain’t makin’ us no free, free.

Democtats are Socialists and Socialists are Communists
And Communists are Slavers, might be your neighbor.
I ain’t sayin’ she a slave trader
But she ain’t makin’ us no free, free.
I ain’t sayin’ she a slave trader
But she ain’t makin’ us no free, free.

Your tax on labor has a Democrat flavor
Second Plank of the Commie, the slaver.
I ain’t sayin’ she a slave trader
But she ain’t makin’ us no free, free.
I ain’t sayin’ she a slave trader
But she ain’t makin’ us no free, free.

Your tax on property, 1st, 3rd and 4th
Got a little time and I’ll tell you some more.
I ain’t sayin’ she a slave trader
But she ain’t makin’ us no free, free.
I ain’t sayin’ she a slave trader
But she ain’t makin’ us no free, free.

Secular Public Schools, well that’s plank 10
Add it all up and Freedom’s has been.
I ain’t sayin’ she a slave trader
But she ain’t makin’ us no free, free.
I ain’t sayin’ she a slave trader
But she ain’t makin’ us no free, free.

the end.

I don’t think I can comment without laughing, laughing.

Pre-emptive posting

December 2, 2005

With the sue-happy society we live in today, I thought the possibilty of being sued by one of the morons I make fun of, is a possibility. Remote, but a possibility. So, with that in mind I went out and searched for legal precedents to use in case the day ever came. I found it.

FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE TO THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

As a First Affirmative Defense to Plaintiff’s Third Cause of Action,
Defendant alleges as follows:
I. The word “asshole” is not a word of specific generic exactitude.The word “asshole,” when used to describe a physical portion of the human body, is a void surrounded by the anal sphincter muscle. On the other hand, when used as a characterization of an individual, the word “asshole” denotes that the individual possesses some or all of the following:

a. His acts or omissions do not conform generally to an accepted pattern among members of a particular social group of which the individual using the characterization is a member.

b. A person who by his conduct causes derision to be heaped upon him by one or more other persons.

c. A person whose conduct has attained the degree of contemptibility such that it defies characterization by any conventional language.

d. A person generally considered by his peers to conduct himself in such a manner as displays a callous disregard for the feelings of other human beings and thus deserving of being shunned and ostracized.

II. Defendant did not intend, nor were his remarks understood by Plaintiff or any other person, to mean that the Plaintiff is in truth and in fact a void surrounded by the anal sphincter muscle. On the other hand, Defendant intended, and Plaintiff and others understood Defendant to mean, that Plaintiff is indeed an “asshole” within the meaning of the colloquialized characterization of an individual as described above.

III. In truth and in fact, Plaintiff is an “asshole.”

The case was dismissed by the Court.